Thursday, 22 February 2018

Rev Matt Hale(Civil Case)...Evidence of Defendant's Current, Unlawful Activity

To read the document in it's entirety see FREE MATT HALE site  Evidence of Defendant's Current, Unlawful Activity


Quotes from Rev Hale contained in the document............

" Please find attached a returned correspondence form that was just delivered to me yesterday, February 13th  (Exhibit A) as well as the correspondence in question to which it pertains (Exhibit B 23 pages double spaced)  I had written this article for distribution to those who believe in my innocence , explaining why I want to be free, the lack of any evidence that I committed a crime, and our ongoing efforts to secure the commutation of my imprisonment at the hands of the great President Donald Trump " 
Why Do I Want to be Free... By Rev Matt Hale    

" Is Hale's expression of his innocence the safety and security concern? Are people less safe and secure by being informed that an innocent man is indeed in prison? Or maybe it was Hale's expression of love for his Mother? His White race? His violin? Nature? Or that he would like to get married and have a family one day? Or maybe it was the expression of his desire to perhaps lead the cause for preservation of  the White race when he is free (free) that is the safety and security concern? "  

" The Defendant and it's employees have repeatedly shown themselves to be reprehensible liars to this court " 

 SUBMITTED... February 14th 2018  




    

Wednesday, 21 February 2018

Who Do I Want To be Free?...By Rev Matt Hale


 
 
         The answer to that question may seem obvious that it need not be forthcoming on my part. After all, I am an innocent man that committed no crime. I have spent 15 years now in prison for something I not only did not do but opposed, and if the so-called "Justice" Department has it's way I'll spend at least another twenty more. I have been a helpless bystander while my dear father and others have died in my absence. What prisoner would not want to regain his freedom? What innocent man would wish to remain behind bars?

          The last time I was free, George W. Bush was in the middle of his first term as President of the United States and Saddam Hussein was still President of Iraq. Strom Thurmond was still in the U.S. Senate. Barack Obama was a little known law professor who has never been elected to public office. Nobody had ever heard of "Facebook," "Twitter," "I-pads," or "I-phones." People still took photos with cameras, not phones for goodness sakes, and I myself was just starting to transition from VHS video tapes to DVDs. A lot can change in 15 years and a lot has. No doubt much will change the next twenty. I would like to be there when it does.

          Those who have been imprisoned themselves for a long period of time for no crime—and in solitary confinement at that—can never quite know what it's like. Justice seems to be like a ghost that you can never get your hands on. It flits about, mocking you, while you remain empty handed. You don't ever want to give up hope but then again you don't want to be a fool either. You realize that the torture of prisoners of war that the politicians like to rail against is nothing compared to the torture  of an innocent man's soul. You can't really relate to your fellow prisoners because they actually committed their crimes and you can't relate to your captors either because they work of course for the very system which wronged you so badly. And so you suffer some days more than others to be sure, while you make the best life for yourself that you can within the four walls that have been allotted to you. You do your best to keep your mind on things other than your predicament. That is all you can do.

          Unlike many innocent prisoners, however, I have been fortunate these years to have the support of so many of you in the free world who have never stopped believing in me, the fact that I committed  no crime, and the cause of our people's future which we all love. For that I am grateful. Most of all though I am grateful to have such a wonderful mother who has stood by me through thick and thin throughout my ordeal, who fights for me all day everyday, and who I only love more and more with each passing hour. Is it wrong for me to have hope that I may be returned to her arms before she to, like my father, meets the fate to which all of us are destined whether we would like it or not? I shudder at the thought that I could lose her while being imprisoned within these walls. I would do anything to avoid that scenario, including the moving of heaven and earth. She deserves her son to be returned to her without any further ado. I deserve her embrace which I have so sorely missed. Is that really too much to ask, my friends?

          I would also like to fulfill my duty as a White man of sound mind and body and find a good wife out there with whom I can continue my line. Is it wrong for me to have visions of my bouncing a little Hale tyke on my knees? What could be more important than our breeding of the next generation?

          As for the facts of my case, let's just be real clear: there is zero evidence that I ever "solicited" somebody to murder anybody and thus the charge is a sick lie on its face. I challenge anyone to show I ordered, instructed,or even encouraged the FBI's highly paid agent provocateur to commit a murder, least of all the murder of the judge who had ruled in our favor. It can't be done and that's all there is to it. I have been horribly wronged and anybody with a scintilla of sense and justice knows it. Anybody can say anything about anyone but that doesn't make it true! What matters rather are the facts and the facts are in my favor. Furthermore, I was given a wildly excessive sentence in a case where nobody was hurt or could have been hurt. Isn't 15 years for a totally made up "crime" long enough then? Is it really necessary to imprison a man for forty years for a totally cooked up government "plot"?

          To be sure, I have done as well as any man in my shoes could. I was blessed by the genes of my parents with a good mind and have put that mind to the best use that I could these years. I have written two of the greatest books for the future of our White people that have ever been written—Ending White Slavery and The Racial Loyalist Manifesto—and am working right now on a third. Still, the fact remains that it is the free world where I can help our people the most. Merely writing books, I fear, is not going to save our White Race. Rather, the right direction, the right organization, and the right hands—, dynamic leadership is what we need if our kind is to survive in this world. Many of you believe that I have what it takes to provide that leadership but I obviously need to be free in order to do it; I can't do it from this prison cell where I am stymied and harassed by my captors at every turn. Rather, I need to obtain my freedom in order to exercise whatever leadership ability I possess. So, it behoves all who care about the future of our White Race in this world to fight for that freedom, not only for my sake but for yours. I am more than willing to lead our cause to victory, if only I am given the chance!

          One thing is likewise for sure: if I have the strength of will to endure decades of solitary confinement and other persecutions for no crime, I have the strength of will to lead our cause to victory as a free man. You can put your faith in Matt Hale because he has justified your faith all these years. I don't falter and I don't quit. I have never been broken by our enemies and I never will be. I have no interest whatever in "ego" or petty rivalries but only the task at hand. I am above that which bogs down most human beings. I live and breath the Racial Loyalist cause. Hense I have the ability to unite and rally all of us for the victory we seek. I am ready to hit the ground running therefore if only I am given the chance! Please help me obtain that chance. Don't let me observe the continued destruction of our White Race as a helpless bystander for another twenty years from this lousy prison cell. I urge you rather to fight for my freedom so that I can fight again for you. Let me put my charisma and drive to good use on your behalf for I know that if you do I will unite and push our movement forward in ways that have never been seen before. At stake is the entire existence of our kind and I am committed to the preservation of that future at all costs.

          So, I want to be free so that I can be reunited with those whom I love: my family, my comrades, and my race itself as we together work for the future of us all. I also, however, want to be free so that I can return to the natural world which I believe in so much. It is not natural for a man to be cooped up in a box of steel, iron, and concrete for years on end; we are meant rather to behold trees, the other creatures of the world, and to feel the green grass under our feet. We are meant to feel the rain, the snow, and the sun. I would be remiss though if I did not mention too my beloved violin which I have likewise been deprived of all these years. As you may know I am a classical violinist who has both taught and played professionally. Just last night I had a dream that I was playing in concert again and sure would like to do so again before I am an old man. Music has always been such a huge part of my life; one of the reasons why I joined the cause for the preservation of our White Race in the first place, at the ripe old age of 12, is that I wanted to preserve the race which is capable of producing such beauty,the beauty of classical music. There can be no more Beethovens, no more Mozarts, and no more Tchaikovskys if we let our White Race be mongrelized and destroyed. Ape—like men can only produce ape—like things. the seed of beauty must be preserved and for me the very image of a violin is symbolic of the superiority of our kind. I do love it so, and would like to return to it! Would you help me to do that, my friends? Will you help me reclaim the life that was so wrongly taken from me so many years ago?

          And so I ask you to do your part today to secure my freedom. A mass movement for my release must be formed which simply cannot be denied. President Trump is the one president with the nerve and the guts to buck his phony "Justice" Department and let me go. That is the only option we have at this juncture. Therefore he must be reached and won over to the proposition of my release. If Nelson Mandela, an actual criminal, could be freed after 27 years of imprisonment due to the influence of the rallied masses the state, so can Matt Hale after 15 the same way. It all depends upon you and the power you can create. Nothing is impossible if you have the will and determination to see it through. The cause of my freedom must become the cause celebre of the entire Racial Loyalist movement. I'm counting on you to make that happen. Every pro—White website must carry the words, "Free Matt Hale!" Thousands of letters, emails, and signatures for my release must be sent to President Trump, Attorney General Sessions, and others. Friends of President Trump must be reached in order that they may encourage him to release me as well. Help my stalwart mother, Evelyn Hutcheson, all you can. I have fought for you all my life. Bring me home so that I may return to my rightful place. Fifteen years of this is enough. Free Matt Hale!


 

Sunday, 18 February 2018

Who Killed John Kennedy...By Ben Klassen

 




No big mystery to those who understand the murderous MOSSAD, the nature of the sinister Jewish power establishment behind it, and to those few of us who have the guts to tell it as it is. Plainly, it was the Jewish MOSSAD who murdered John F. Kennedy.

Last November 22, my wife and I celebrated our forty-second wedding anniversary, and we did so in the company of our children and grandchildren on a special vacation at Disney World. On that same day the world widely acclaimed and publicized the anniversary of the criminal assassination of the then young and glamorous President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, shot down in cold blood in the streets of Dallas twenty-five years earlier. Numerous feature articles appeared in newspapers, tabloids and on television screens commemorating that fateful day. But after 25 years, the mystery of who shot Kennedy on November 22, 1963, seemingly still remains unsolved and beclouded. Numerous theories, mostly bizarre and off the mark, still swirl around that historic and dastardly deed.

I remember that day well, as undoubtedly do millions of others who were then old enough to realize the shock and impact of that foul crime. When my 12-year-old daughter came home from school that day, the first thing she said was "Boy! those Republicans don’t fool around, do they?" True, her assessment may have been premature and somewhat naive, but perhaps no more so than the numerous theories and conclusions floating around in the minds of the vast majority of the American public today, and certainly it was no more wild than the official conclusion put out by the Warren Commission that was quickly set up to whitewash and confuse the whole criminal affair. After months of "investigation" the commission managed to so contrive the "evidence" that it would support the conclusion they wanted to project even before they started the expensive and long drawn out probe – namely, that it was nothing more than one lone, erratic nut – Lee Harvey Oswald – who did the job, all by his impulsive little lonesome.

Despite the massive propaganda barrage that the Jews have slopped on us for the last 25 years, the American public and the world at large still won’t buy that ridiculous explanation. In fact, at the time of the 25th anniversary in 1988 there was not only widespread coverage recalling the event, but there were also a number of public opinion polls taken as to what the public believed or did not believe about the Warren Commission’s official verdict. The Orlando Sentinel ran one such poll in their program called "Sound Off." Of the 2039 callers who answered their key question – Did Lee Harvey Oswald act alone in assassinating President John F. Kennedy? – 1890 callers (93 percent) said they did not believe it. This was 25 years later, and after the prestigious Warren Commission who had spent months of endless "investigation" saying that a lone nut was responsible and that was all – there was no conspiracy!

When this did not wash with the American public, the Rockefeller Commission was set up later to again investigate and whitewash the same affair, to try to shore up the public confidence in the Warren lie. When this still did not do the job, years later the House Select Committee on Assassination was set up, headed by a capable lawyer named Richard Sprague. When it seemed he might be coming too close to the facts, the CIA and FBI decided to have him sacked. The CIA took over and the cover-up of the crime proceeded to grind out the same impossible and ridiculously stupid conclusion as the Warren Commission. That the public still didn’t believe it was shown by numerous polls conducted at that time and the ensuing years. Today, after numerous books and thousands of articles and "documentaries" by the Jewish press, the public at large and the world as a whole overwhelmingly rejects the ridiculous conclusion that "there was no conspiracy," as Is shown by the Orlando Sentinel poll (93 percent rejection) and numerous other polls.
Although the American public is extremely gullible and will swallow most of the lies slopped upon it by the Jewish propaganda machine (such as the Holohoax) evidently the "official" Warren Commission lie is just too, too much even for the gullible American public to accept. And there is good and sufficient reason why such an outright and blatant lie cannot and will not wash, as we shall see. But whereas the American public will not buy the lone nut, no conspiracy story, it still remains hopelessly confused as to who did do it, and as to why Kennedy was assassinated.


Before we go into the who and the why, let us briefly review the known and accepted events of that fateful episode that in a few brief moments changed the course of American and world history.

 
On November 22, 1963 John Kennedy, in the company of his glamorous wife Jacqueline, was riding in an open motorcade through the streets of Dallas, ostensibly to shore up his sagging political Image. As he was riding by the Dealey Plaza and past the Texas School Book Depository Building at 12:30 PM, shots suddenly rang out. Governor John Connally, who was riding in the same car In a seat in front of Kennedy was severely wounded. John Kennedy, whose brains were blown out by one of the shots, was pronounced dead on arrival at the Parkland Hospital, to which the car was rushed.

Lee Harvey Oswald, a drifter and nonentity without means, had evidently been carefully coached and set up by the conspirators to play the part of the fall guy. He was seen running out of the Texas School Book Depository Building, and a Dallas policeman by the name of J.D. Tippit, who tried to arrest Oswald shortly thereafter, was shot and killed in the act. Presumably he was killed by Oswald, but even this conclusion is questionable. Shortly thereafter Oswald was captured and taken into custody.

He was promptly questioned by seven FBI agents for 12 hours. Forty-seven hours after Kennedy was shot, while in the custody of Federal agents and being transferred in a passageway beneath the Dallas police building, Oswald himself was gunned down by a Jewish night club operator named Jack Ruby, (real name - Jacob Rubenstein). This was done in broad daylight in full view of the television cameras, and thereby instantly was destroyed a highly visible but unstable key witness who could have shed considerable light on the conspiracy. He was, however, only one of 29 people who were connected with the conspiracy who were to die prematurely and violently under mysterious circumstances, as we shall see.

Lyndon B. Johnson, Vice-President under Kennedy, was quickly sworn in as President during the flight back from Dallas to Washington. Contrary to all legal procedures and to the laws of Texas, Kennedy’s body was also flown to Washington and taken out of the jurisdiction of the Texas authorities. So too was the investigation of this foul crime. The now president Lyndon Johnson quickly curtailed the investigation and bypassed independent Texas authorities who had prime legal jurisdiction by appointing the Warren Commission as the sole authority to do the job. Seemingly this was done because the crime was of such magnitude that the usual authorities who should have had legal jurisdiction (the Dallas police, the State of Texas) were too minor to be entrusted with such a major crime. Actually, the real reason, as we shall see, was so that the cover-up could be contained and controlled in one highly selective package, a package carefully stacked so that it could be trusted to do just what it did do – not to investigate the crime at all, but on the contrary, cover it up.

The Warren Commission, headed by Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, took over all aspects of the investigation and barred all other authorities who had prior and legal right to do so. In this it was backed up by the controlled Jewish press, by the FBI, and by the CIA. In fact, it became a willing tool of these latter two federal agencies and did as it was told.

The story of the cover-up was long and odious, and unfortunately, we cannot cover all the details of its many dubious procedures, nor can we fully review its preconceived conclusion that it contrived to report in thousands of pages. Let me repeat that after all the massive propaganda support it received, despite volumes of lies sworn to by the FBI and the CIA, the fact remains – that after 25 years, even a highly gullible American public does not believe the commission’s ridiculous and impossible fairy tale.
Basically, the conclusions the Warren Commission reported were these:

(a) There was no conspiracy.

(b) Lee Harvey Oswald, a lone nut, did it all by himself. He fired all the shots that killed Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally from a sixth story window of the Texas School Book Depository building.

(c) This consisted of only three shots fired from a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle made in Italy.


There is more, much more, thousands of pages of garbage, that is the story put out by the Warren Commission. It was the conclusion they were determined to foist on the public before they ever even started gathering "facts" and "information," and they stuck with it to the bitter end, either ignoring or twisting any evidence that did not fit their preconceived "conclusion." The story is so wild that it could easily fit into our series of "The Wildest Stories Ever Told."
The Wildest Stories Ever Told Part One By Ben Klassen  No wonder. The authors have a common mentor – the Jewish power establishment. Also, no wonder that after 25 years and massive doses of lies and propaganda the overwhelming majority of the American public still won’t buy it.


Here are some of the strange and bizarre antics and episodes that occurred during this blatant crime and fraudulent cover-up.

• Although the alleged key culprit, Lee Harvey Oswald, was questioned by seven FBI operatives for 12 hours, the transcripts of the interrogations were burned and destroyed forever.

• Oswald was murdered within 47 hours of the assassination by Jack Ruby, a sleazy pimp and himself a paid operative of the FBI. This he was ostensibly able (allowed) to do while Oswald was in the custody and "protection" of Federal agents.

• In order to make sure that Jack Ruby would not at some later date recant and spill the beans, he conveniently "died of cancer" while in prison awaiting trial.

• None of Oswald’s fingerprints were found on the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle with which he was accused of shooting the president. Since he rushed out of the Depository building Immediately after the president was shot, he would hardly have had the time to clean it up.

• Although Oswald was known to be a poor marksman with a rifle (several months earlier, April 6, 1963, to be exact, he had taken a shot at right-wing Maj. Gen. Edwin Walker and missed) the Warren Commission credited him with the miraculous feat of inflicting eight different wounds on President Kennedy and Governor John Connally within six seconds from a distance of more than 200 feet and at an angle that would have taxed the professional skills of even the world’s most expert marksman.

• One of these bullets was credited by the Warren Commission as having followed this most amazing route: It supposedly went through President Kennedy’s back and came out of his neck, then went through Gov. Connally’s back and out of his chest, into the Governor’s wrist and out of his wrist into his leg. Now, man, that is some shooting! Strangely, this same alleged bullet was then accidentally found lying on the floor of the Parkland Hospital where the victims were taken. When "discovered," this magic bullet was found to be clean as a whistle, unscarred and unmashed, even though It supposedly had traversed and shattered ribs, wrists and other bones in its most remarkable trajectory. Would you believe?

• The Warren report blandly stated that "no credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from any other place than the Texas School Depository Building." This despite the fact that the commission knew the names of at least 266 witnesses present at the scene of the crime. Of these two hundred and fifty nine were able to testify before the Dallas police, the Dallas Sheriff’s Dept., the FBI or the Secret Service. In the case of 68 persons interviewed or called as witnesses, the law enforcement interrogators "forgot" to ask where they thought the shots came from. Of the 90 who were asked this important question 58 said that the shots came from the grassy knoll (in front of the motorcade) and not from the Texas Book Depository Building (behind the motorcade). Strangely most of the 32 who disagreed about the shots coming from the grassy knoll were government officials, their wives, or aides. Nevertheless, even ignoring coercion or bribery of such officials two thirds of the witnesses affirmed they believed the shots came from the grassy knoll in front of the motorcade, a very important piece of evidentiary information the Commission chose to completely ignore. We will have more to say about this later.


• There was one individual spectator, a man by the name of Zapruder who happened to film the motorcade at the time of the shooting, using an 8mm movie camera. Since this was hard evidence that could refute the conclusions desired by the conspirators, the CIA moved quickly to appropriate the film.
LIFE magazine in Its October 2, 1964 Issue ran an article by then Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Michigan) who was a member of the Warren Commission. In this article, it ran eight pictures of the critical frames from the Zapruder film. In one issue frame No. 6 showed blood and brains spurting upward from the head of Kennedy. Evidently LIFE had committed an unforgivable error that could have run counter to the establishment’s directive. The presses were stopped in mid-run and a new No. 6 picture was substituted, which merely showed the president slumped over. Someone from higher up evidently gave the order. When a keen reporter (who had a copy of both issues) years later tried to obtain an explanation from LIFE, the management blandly denied that there had been a switch or that there had been two versions.


• Nitrate tests exonerated Lee Harvey Oswald from having fired a rifle on November 22, but this evidence was suppressed.

• Oswald vehemently denied that he had shot anybody, but because he evidently had much more he could tell, he was quickly murdered and removed from the picture.

• Oswald was questioned by a federal agent back in August 1963, but the notes were later burned.

• X-ray and autopsy pictures of the dead president have been concealed from the public to this day.

• The Warren Commission claims that only three shots were fired and all came from Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. Two of these shots were fired within 1.2 seconds (according to the Commission as evidenced by the Zapruder film). Officials of the Mannlicher Steyr factory in Italy found this most flattering, but stated that the time lapse between shots from their rifle had never been less than 2.3 seconds.
• When a newspaper in Spain (La Voz de Espana) printed that story and it was brought to the attention of the Senate Press Gallery, one of the pressmen (an agent of the CIA) asked if he could have the copy to photocopy it. It was "accidentally" destroyed.


• When the same individual who had dug up this issue tried to get another copy from the Spanish newspaper, he was told that they happened to have ample copies of every issue except that one particular issue. It had disappeared.
• During the Kennedy autopsy, his brain (what was left of it) was removed and placed in a stainless steel container with formalin. This chemical "sets" the brain tissue so it can be sliced and examined. It was placed in the National Archives, under lock and key.

Some years later, the neutron activation tests were perfected. These remarkable tests could accurately tell, for instance, by taking one hair from Napoleon’s head how much arsenic had been given to him to cause his death. They could also tell whether Kennedy had been shot from the front or the back. When forensic pathologists went to the National Archives to try to conduct just such tests and settle once and for all the question of from which direction had he been shot, the JFK brain had disappeared from the archives. To this day, nobody knows where it is (officially).


That the conspirators were determined to suppress the real information at all costs was evidenced by the fact that it was apparently dangerous to know too much about the crime, should such people not be subject to control in cooperating in the cover-up. I have already mentioned that two people, Lee Harvey Oswald, and Jack Ruby, met violent and untimely deaths. Both of them were part of the conspiracy, and neither apparently could be trusted not to blow the whistle. But they were only two out of a string of at least 29 people who had some knowledge of the conspiracy and who, over a period of years, died under mysterious and violent circumstances. These murders, too had to be covered up in an ever-widening circle of complications. That the conspirators, whoever they were, or are, have been able to successfully do so over the last 25 years proves more than anything else that the conspiracy is not only determined and pervasive, BUT ALSO TREMENDOUSLY POWERFUL. Here are a few of those that met with an untimely death because they knew too much.

• Dorothy Kilgallen, a nationally known syndicated columnist and television personality interviewed Jack Ruby during the latter’s trial for killing Oswald. She then made the mistake of telling her make-up man that she was going to "break the Kennedy assassination wide open within five days." Three days later, November 8, 1965, she was found dead in her apartment.

• Gary Underhill, a CIA agent, told friends he knew who killed Kennedy, and that he was sure that they would soon get him (Underhill) also. On May 8, 1964, Underhill was shot to death in Washington.

• William Pitzer, a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy had photographed the military-performed autopsy of JFK’s body. He told friends he had been ordered to keep quiet about what he saw and did so for years. Nevertheless, he was found dead with a bullet in his head on October 29, 1966.

• Carlos Prio Socarras, formerly a sometime president of Cuba and at one time a business associate of Jack Ruby, died on April 15, 1977, of what was declared "a self-inflicted’ gunshot wound to the chest.

• Joseph A. Milteer, who was identified by Miami Police as a "right-wing extremist," was secretly taped by the Florida lawmen in which he accurately described how Kennedy would be assassinated. This he did 13 days before the event. On February 9, 1974 a Coleman stove blew up in his bathroom. He died two weeks later, but the mortician who saw the body said the burns were not sufficient to cause his death.

• David Ferrie was a CIA contract pilot who flew secret missions into Cuba. New Orleans D.A., Jim Garrison, in a trial, questioned the flier, implying that Ferrie had flown the real killers out of Dallas and into Cuba immediately after the assassination. On February 21, 1967, a month after the questioning, David Ferrie was found dead in his apartment, shot in the heart.
 

There are more detailed stories easily available of people who knew too much and consequently died an untimely, violent death under mysterious circumstances. However, we do not have the space here to further pursue each case. I believe, however, that I have cited sufficient examples to show that the conspirators, whoever they might be, are powerful, are ruthless killers, and will leave no stone unturned in suppressing any evidence which they suspect might surface to blow their conspiracy.

* * * * *
We now come to the heart of the story. Who might these conspirators be? We have clearly established that there was a widespread conspiracy, planned long before its execution on November 22, 1963. More importantly, the evidence further strongly indicates that there was a vast cover-up, and It, too, was meticulously planned long before the Warren Commission was set up to whitewash the real conspirators and blame the "lone nut," Oswald, as the culprit of the foul deed. That Oswald was a naive patsy, and a small cog in the operation, of that there is no doubt, but he was neither the main instigator of the huge plot, nor is it likely that he even so much as fired a shot. Then who did? Moreover, who was powerful enough to successfully carry out a pervasive cover-up that spread not only throughout the nerve centers of power in this country but even to the press and power centers of foreign countries as well?


There are any number of individuals or groups who would have had motives to kill Kennedy, and perhaps would also have had the means to do so. After all, any man, no matter how well protected, is vulnerable to the assassin’s bullet, as has been proved more recently in that President Reagan was shot at and hit, as also was Pope John Paul II and a number of other highly protected individuals. From time to time, a considerable number have been mentioned as possible suspects of killing Kennedy, people and parties who had both the means and the motive:

• Fidel Castro, because there was information out that the U.S. was going to liquidate him.

• The anti-Castro groups, because Kennedy betrayed them at the Bay of Pigs fiasco.

• The Kremlin and the KGB because of the missile crisis and other frictions, had both motive and the means.

• The list that has been brought up at one time or another is almost endless. For one reason or another the following have also been mentioned: the CIA, the FBI, Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, H.L. Hunt, E. Howard Hunt, Howard Hughes, Aristotle Onassis, David Rockefeller, and even Jacqueline Kennedy.

Each one of these, it has been argued, could have conceivably had some motive to see him dead. There is one major test, however, that none of these could possibly meet, and that is the all-pervasive power in the press, in the political field, in the judicial field (and several other major areas) to plan and stage a successful cover-up, something the conspirators have more or less succeeded in doing for the last 25 years.
Who could possibly have the power to do this? Who could stop the presses of LIFE magazine in mid-run and change pictures? Who could yank the Supreme Court Justice out of his routine and put him at the head of a whitewash committee? Who could command the whole news media to consistently support a blatant and transparent lie claiming that there was no conspiracy? Who could tell the Mannlicher-Carcano Corporation and its employees, even in Italy, to keep their mouths shut? Who could possibly murder at least 29 other people who knew too much and get away with it?

The Spotlight, in a series of articles it compiled over a period of years and put together in a book call
the Mystery Unraveled, asks similar questions, but then at the very end it gets cold feet and cops out by leaving the question unanswered, and thereby does not quite unravel the mystery. DeWest Hooker, who is credited with being the first to enlighten George Lincoln Rockwell about the evil ways of the Jew (see dedication of G.L.R.’s book, This Time the World) was also an early cohort of Willis Carto in their Nazi days, told me that Carto had told him that The Spotlight can use such terms as "dual loyalists," "Zionists," "Israelis," but had been forbidden to use the word "Jew" in reference to any culpability in any endeavor whatsoever. Who would have the power to tell Willis Carto and The Spotlight that they cannot ever under any circumstances accuse the Jews directly of anything?



Why, who else but the Jewish establishment and the Jewish powerhouse itself? It is they who have the power to not only suppress any information they deem deleterious or harmful to their cause, but they can also spread wholesale all over the world any lie or set of lies they deem beneficial to their cause, and this they blatantly have done for centuries. The cover-up of the Kennedy assassination is one major example, but by no means the only one. The Six Million lie, the holohoax, is an even bigger lie they have successfully promoted, and Communism and Christianity are two more gigantic Jewish lies.

The whole stance and position of The Spotlight is in itself a strange case in point. Whereas it proudly proclaims to print news that other papers (meaning the Jewish establishment papers) do not dare to print, it does in fact present a wealth of news on the many shady shenanigans the government and the Jewish establishment would just as soon the public did not hear. Many of these news items are directly aimed at our cozy relationship with Israel and how Israel is manipulating the United States and ripping off the American taxpayer. It has even run a powerful expose on the 1967 Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, and referred to it repeatedly, something the establishment press does not dare to touch.

But here is the strange paradox in The Spotlight’s position. It will go so far in pointing to the Jewish stranglehold in America and the world, but then it will pull back. It will never say explicitly, loud and clear, the Jews are behind it. Dual loyalists, Zionists, Israelis, yes, but not Jews, per se. The Jews, on the other hand, blatantly accuse The Spotlight of being violently anti-Semitic, and The Spotlight will vigorously deny it, and so they play the game. The fact is, there are a number of Jews on The Spotlight staff. Their star lawyer, Mark Lane, is a Jew. So are Charles M. Fischbein, the Collier brothers, Alfred Lilienthal and others.

Mark Lane’s and The Spotlight’s treatment of the Kennedy assassination is a case in point. Mark Lane has written a major book Rush to Judgment on this heinous crime, and written several subsequent follow-up articles, as have others on the staff. Mark Lane makes it very clear that the Warren Commission lied to the American public, that there was undoubtedly a vast conspiracy behind it, and that the whitewash and cover-up were of unprecedented magnitude. Anyone with an ounce of reasoning would be led to the same conclusion as we have come to – but strangely, he does not. He concludes that it was the CIA, which as we all know is American, don’t we? So the Jews, Israel, and the MOSSAD had nothing to do with it, right? But then, you wouldn’t expect a Jew to blow the whistle on the Jews, now would you?

This is a last minute diversion that is typical of most of The Spotlight’s reporting – point in that direction then cop out in the finale. All of which raises the question is The Spotlight controlled by the Jews, or isn’t it? We believe it is. We believe it fits neatly into the class III journal category, the Trap Classification, which is described in Protocol No. 11 of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Whereas The Spotlight is evidently (for obvious reasons) not willing to put the finger on the Jewish network for the assassination and cover-up of the Kennedy crime, we of the Church of the Creator come up with the obvious and only answer: The Jews planned the foul job and their murderous band of bloodthirsty killers, the MOSSAD pulled the trigger or triggers that killed Kennedy.
 

* * * * *

Who or what is the MOSSAD? Most Americans have never even heard of it, and few even know it exists. It is therefore cogent that we expand here briefly on the nature of the Jewish MOSSAD.

The MOSSAD is, in a way, the Israeli equivalent of our CIA, but it is much more. It is the Jewish intelligence-gathering arm, whose headquarters are in Tel Aviv, Israel, but their vast armies are spread into every country of the world. Like the CIA, they not only gather information relentlessly from every corner, nook and cranny of the world, but they also ruthlessly murder people they deem a threat to the Jewish conspiracy. They foment revolutions, hatch political plots, overthrow governments, assassinate key figures, stage commando raids where necessary, or organize revolutionary movements, all in the cause of the Jewish race. The CIA, or the Russian KGB do all these things also, but with this difference. Since the Jews control practically all the nerve centers of power throughout the United States and the world, so do the intelligence agencies of the United States collaborate with the MOSSAD. In short, the CIA and the KGB are adjuncts of the MOSSAD, with the MOSSAD firmly in control of all. The CIA feeds all important Information it gathers not only into its own computers in Washington, but also into the huge bank of computers in Tel Aviv. So does the KGB, so does the British Intelligence, the German and the French. The MOSSAD gathers all, but it does not give any back. It is a one-way street.

In fact, the CIA and FBI are heavily infiltrated by, and staffed with MOSSAD agents. The MOSSAD also makes sure that their own agents are in every agency of the government, in the staff of every congressman and senator, and, in fact, every important nerve center of power.

In short, the MOSSAD is purely Jewish – loyal only to Israel and the Jewish race and the worldwide Jewish conspiracy. It is the world’s most powerful, most efficient gang of killers. Although, historically speaking, the name of MOSSAD is of recent vintage, under other names the roots of these murderous brigades go far back in history. When the Jews describe the killing of 75,000 of their enemies in the Book of Esther, they were describing a typical MOSSAD operation, and they have been celebrating their PURIM every year ever since. Killing their enemies is what they mean by "having a good day." These killers run rampant throughout every country in the world, including, and especially, the United States. Our congressmen are acutely aware, and also deathly afraid of them, and for good reason, as are most personnel in the government’s employ.
It is my unswerving conclusion that when the Jews planned to assassinate John Kennedy, it was the MOSSAD which did the job. They had their professional triggermen carry out the execution and do it right. They had their sharpshooters set up behind a stone wall on the grassy knoll in front of the motorcade and when Kennedy was in close range they let him have it from front and back and blew his brains out. That is why the Warren Commission repeatedly ignored eyewitness reports about the shots from the activities on the grassy knoll. At the same time they placed Oswald in the School Book Depository Building to play the part of the fall guy, but you can be sure they did not leave the real killing job to a third rate bungler like Lee Harvey Oswald.


* * * * *

We now come to the question of motive. Why would the Jews want to kill Kennedy?

When it comes to motives, I confess I do not claim to be a mind reader. We can only speculate, look at the ensuing events of history and come up with cogent reasons as to why they did what they did. With that as a basis I can think of several important reasons why they would want to see John Kennedy dead, and I will list them in what I believe to be their order of importance.
 
1. According to the Canadian Intelligence Service of September, 1988, Kennedy committed the most deadly of all crimes in the eyes of the Jewish bankers. He bypassed the Jewish Federal Reserve and issued government notes. He committed the same unforgivable sin as did President Abraham Lincoln a hundred years earlier and for which he, too, paid the ultimate price. In the complex cover-up of the Kennedy murder, history repeated itself and a strangely similar modus operandi was used as in the cover-up of the Lincoln crime some 98 years earlier.

On June 30, 1963, Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110, and further amended E.O. No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, thereby giving the President authority to issue the currency. He thereupon ordered the issue of $4,292,893,815.00. This was almost ten times as much as the $450,000,000.00 printed by Lincoln during the Civil War. He evidently forced then Secretary of the Treasury, C. Douglas Dillon, another name changing Jew (Lapowski?), to sign the United States Notes. Shortly thereafter, on November 22, 1963, Kennedy paid the ultimate price and was shot, as was Lincoln.

The first thing President Johnson did when he flew back to Washington was to reverse this order. For good reasons this operation of printing U.S. notes (as mandated by the Constitution) has been shrouded in secrecy by the Jewish bankers, since, if it became general knowledge, would blow the cover on the whole Federal Reserve scam. Even among racial and ‘conservative’ circles there is much confusion and a general ignorance of this bold and monumental action. When I discussed this issue with Tom Metzger about a year ago, he vehemently assured me that he had thoroughly investigated this matter of Kennedy printing the notes, and that there was nothing to it.

However, we have the Executive Order number, the date, and the amount of the issuance, all stated In the above. Even more convincing, I have seen and personally held in my hand one of those U.S. notes – a five dollar bill.
2. The second serious infraction that Kennedy made in opposition to the Jewish conspiracy was his decision to end U.S. participation in the Vietnam fiasco before it had hardly begun, a move that angered the Jews, since they had planned an increasingly heavy, long term involvement in that stupid venture. Present on Air Force One with Kennedy on his fateful trip to Texas was Rep. Henry Gonzales of Texas. On March 21, 1988, Rep. Gonzales revealed a bit of significant history in a speech before the House. Gonzalez told that on said trip, Kennedy, as he rose to leave the (airplane) compartment, turned and said to him (paraphrased), "By the way, I have issued orders to pull all our military and their equipment from Vietnam, beginning this December." The Jews had different plans as we all know only too well. They planned to bleed the American treasury dry, to kill thousands of young American boys in the jungles of Vietnam and destroy American prestige and honor, what was then left of it. All this they did with a vengeance. Kennedy was killed within hours after he talked to Gonzalez, and Lyndon Johnson, as soon as he became president, reversed that order, and used the Tonkin Gulf "incident" to vastly expand the ill-fated American presence in Vietnam. This insane war helped to put billions of profits into the hands of the Jewish war profiteers, at the expense of the world’s foremost patsy, the White American taxpayer. (See Operation Rip-off, our Booklet No. 103.)


3. The third reason the Jews had for seeing Kennedy dead was inherent in the whole Kennedy clan. They had all the characteristics necessary to build a powerful goy dynasty, and this the Jews feared from the time old Joe Kennedy began building his powerful empire. The Kennedys were extremely wealthy, they were numerous, they were clannish, and they were politically ambitious and aggressive. Joe Kennedy already had ambitions in the thirties of grooming his oldest son Joe, Jr., to become a future president of the United States, and Joe, Jr. was shaping up to become an ideal candidate, being considerably more articulate and charismatic than was his younger brother John. Unfortunately, Joe was killed while on a bombing mission during W.W. II. Routine casualty of war, or did the Jew plan it that way? We will never know, but Joe Jr. was out of the way,
accidentally or deliberately. Joe Sr. still had three more sons, and he next groomed son John, who, as we all know, by hook or by crook did become president in 1960. We also know that Bobby became Attorney General, and later Senator. Teddy as we all know also became Senator, and is still in the Senate today. The third generation of Kennedys are also entering the political domain, despite three violent deaths in the Kennedy clan.

There was one other thing that the Jews feared about the Kennedys. Although we have been told about their extreme liberal orientation in the Democratic Party, essentially old Joe and his four boys were extremely well versed in the existence of the worldwide Jewish network and their string pulling. Although John feigned to go along with Israel and the Jews, it was not sincere, paying only lip service for political gain. The Jews, being well trained in detecting the innermost sentiments of their enemies since before the days of Esther, did not trust John Kennedy and feared the rise of a Kennedy dynasty that might turn on them at the earliest opportunity. In his decisions on Vietnam, on issuing U.S. notes without the benefit of the Federal Reserve and in his lukewarm support of Israel, John Kennedy was already beginning to display his rebellion against the Jewish powerhouse. Consequently he had to go, as five years later in 1968, did his brother Bobby, and Teddy, being of even more dubious moral fibre, is now thoroughly locked in their embrace.

4. Shortly before he was assassinated Kennedy made a speech to a group of Cuban patriots in Miami. In this speech he revealed that he had been betrayed and double-crossed during the Bay of Pigs invasion, that whereas he had ordered air cover, someone in the chain of command reversed the order at the last moment and left the Cuban freedom fighters to the mercy of Castro’s militia. "We will have our revenge!" he is quoted as saying. The Jews, who put Castro in power in the first place, saw it otherwise, and were determined that Cuba remain in the Communist camp.

5. Back in 1963, before he was shot, John himself did not have the public image of being the great "hero" that the glitz and hoopla of Jewish propaganda has now, 25 years later, built him up to be. In fact, he was thoroughly hated and despised by many. After his Bay of Pigs debacle in Cuba, he was regarded as a wimp by many. After he used 20,000 army troops in strong-arm tactics to force one miserable nigger into the university at Oxford, Mississippi, he enraged most of the White electorate and many people began to ask "Whose side is this damn fellow on, anyway?" His many extramarital affairs with prostitutes and other sleazy characters earned him nothing but disgust. Nor did his associations with the Frank Sinatra "rat pack" and Mafia characters win him any popularity ratings. The fact is while he was alive, he was becoming the laughing stock of the American electorate. A phonograph record put out by nightclub comic Vaughn Meader parodying the Kennedy family was rapidly becoming a runaway best seller, and the nightclub comedians, too, in general, were having a field day in which the Kennedys were the butt of their jokes.

What did all this have to do with the Jews? Well, a great deal. It was at this time, in the early sixties, that the Jews were getting their major onslaught into high gear to ram their plethora of "civil rights" legislation through congress, but with the unpopular image with which the Kennedy administration was now saddled, they were getting nowhere. All this changed overnight after he was shot. He now suddenly became a legendary hero, and the American nation not only was in shock, but somehow felt terribly guilty about his death. President Johnson (actually the Jews) wasted no time capitalizing on this ridiculous guilt feeling, and "in the name of our martyred President," he and congress rushed through one civil rights bill after another, all designed to mongrelize and pump the black blood of Africa into the unwilling veins of White America.

6. There was one other extra dividend the Jews reaped from this murderous affair. Whereas old Joe Kennedy (and the family) had a major grip on the liquor industry, especially the importation of Scotch whiskey, this now rapidly slipped out of their hands and to the benefit of the rival (Jewish) Bronfman family. Although it was not really a significant factor in causing Kennedy’s execution, nevertheless, the Jews never miss a bet in cashing in financially.
So John Kennedy was murdered by a brigade of professional killers, the Jewish MOSSAD. Both the execution and the cover-up were planned months in advance by the only force in the world that had the pervasive power to draw on all its resources in the news media, the government and the judicial agencies, namely the worldwide Jewish network. Nobody else could have done it and made it stick, and that, my White Racial Comrades, is an obvious fact.

* * * * *

Such is the nature of our treacherous enemy. Unless we smash this rapacious beast it will certainly devour us all. The only way we can stop the Jews from destroying the White Race is to smash this sinister behemoth to smithereens, once and for all, and the only way it can be done is with a superior and more powerful force than theirs. Let us remember that the Jews built their power network solely through the aegis of their racial religion. With 500 million White people on this planet we certainly still have the wherewithal to destroy this plague upon mankind, and with Creativity as the rallying point we have the vehicle and the means with which to do the job. Do your part in building that power structure. Become a militant partisan, an activist Creator in the fight for survival, expansion and advancement of the White Race. Become involved, heavily involved! Time is of the essence.

* * * * *
Extract from Protocol 11
(From Page 223 of Nature’s Eternal Religion)


The future despotic Jewish State will have three classes of journals that they will control. In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. These journals will always stand guard over the Jewish interests and they admit that, therefore, their influence will be comparatively small. In the second rank will be semi-official organs whose part it will be to attract the tepid and indifferent Goyim. In the third rank they will set up their own papers, but to all appearances they will be In opposition to their regime. This will (a) trap their real opponents to accept this simulated position as their own. (b) They can lead the opposition opinion into the very channels to which they then desire, and thereby neutralize them.

* * * * *
In this regard, Racial Loyalty stands nearly alone in category No. 4 – a journal which the Jew can’t control, and truly loathes and fears.

Ben Klassen
Founder Church of the Creator



 
 
 
ARTICLE TAKEN FROM RACIAL LOYALTY # 46
January 16AC (1989)
 
 

Sunday, 11 February 2018

Rev Matt Hale (Civil Case)... Response to Plaintiff's Motion Reguarding Declarations


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW

REVEREND MATT HALE,

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendant.
 
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION REGARDING DECLARATIONS (DOC. 206)
Mr. Hale seeks to have the Court accept filings from persons who are not parties to this case. Doc. 206, “Motion to Allow Declarations by Non-Parties to be Filed.” These declarations are related to a prior “Notice,” in which Mr. Hale raises several allegations against the BOP. Doc. 204, “Notice of Recent Continuing Unlawful Activity by the Defendant and its Employees Germane to the Eventual Resolution of this Case” (“Notice”). The Court should deny the motion because the Notice itself is not a proper filing under the procedures established by this Court.

The Notice is the fourth in a pattern of filings that are actually extra briefs related to the
pending motion for summary judgment. See Doc. 200 (“Clarification Regarding Press

Release(s)”); Doc. 201 (“Notice of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedy Regarding Ban on All
of Plaintiff’s Religious Mail”); Doc. 202 (“Motion to Strike and Response to So-Called ‘Fact
Exhibit’”). Mr. Hale describes this most recent Notice as containing “allegations” against the BOP that he deems to be “Germane to the Eventual Resolution of this Case.” Doc. 204 at 1;
 

Doc. 206 at 2 (discussing Hale’s “allegations”). Briefing on the motion for summary judgment
has closed, and the Court should not countenance Mr. Hale’s fourth attempt to submit an
improper surreply. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d) (full briefing on a motion consists of the
motion, response, and reply); see also C.J. Krieger Civ. Practice Standard 7.6.2(c) (discussing
motion for summary judgment, response, and reply).1 Therefore, no supporting declarations in
support of the Notice are warranted.

In any event, if the Court examines the substance of Mr. Hale’s filings, the factual allegations in the Notice and subsequent motion for declarations are inaccurate. Mr. Hale accuses the BOP of violating “federal law and B.O.P. policy” by returning mail to his followers in October and November 2017, and that the former Warden of the ADX “lied” to his mother
about the address for the ADX. Doc. 204 ¶¶ 3-5; see also id. ¶ 8 (noting that Hale is trying to get
an ADX Special Investigative Services Technician arrested). In fact, the mailing address for
inmates incarcerated at the ADX is P.O. Box 8000, but mailings sent to P.O. Box 8500 are also delivered to inmates, including Mr. Hale. Declaration of Amy Kelley, Exhibit 1 ¶¶ 8-10.

It is also not the case that the BOP “is stopping [Mr. Hale] from receiving mail” from the persons from whom he has solicited declarations. Doc. 206 at 2. Since Mr. Hale was re-designated to the ADX in April 2017, he has received 52 letters that included “a declaration for
this action or the copy of some sort of pleading or filing by that correspondent in this action.” Id.
1 See also Partminer Worldwide Inc. v. Silconexpert Technologies Inc., No. 09-cv-00586-MSKMJW,
2011 WL 587971, at *6 (D. Colo. Feb. 9, 2011) (recognizing that, “when a party believes
that the contentions in the opponent’s reply brief require a response, the proper approach is for
the party to seek leave to file a surreply,” and finding that a party’s “objections to misstatements
in [a] reply brief . . . were an improper surreply”) (citing Pippin v. Burlington Resources Oil &
Gas Co., 440 F.3d 1186, 1192 (10th Cir. 2006)).

 
¶ 17. He has received declarations from his followers as recently as February 2018. Id. During
the entire period from April 2017 to the present, the BOP has rejected only three incoming
mailings that included a correspondent’s declaration, and that was because the mailings also
contained security threat group information, which inmates are not allowed to possess. Id. ¶ 18.

Those mailings were not rejected because of the declarations. Id.
Finally, by BOP policy, Mr. Hale cannot receive books from persons or entities
masquerading as bookstores. See Doc. 204 ¶ 7 (contending that he has not been allowed to
receive a “final Creativity book”). The book was rejected because the BOP could not determine
the identity of the sender—someone or something that called itself “MBookman Bookseller.”
Exhibit 1 ¶¶ 13-14. As the ADX Special Investigative Services Lieutenant explains, “[a]
publication does not need to be sent by Amazon or similar retail corporation in order to be
approved, but it must have some indicia of legitimacy or ways that correctional staff—who must
cull through voluminous records to determine when outside actors are passing unsafe, unsecure,
or dangerous information to convicted inmates—can determine its status as a publisher, book
club, or bookstore.” Id. ¶ 14. Here, the necessary indicia of legitimacy of “MBookman” was completely lacking. Id.

 
The Court should deny Mr. Hale’s motion. Doc. 206.

Respectfully submitted on February 9, 2018.

ROBERT C. TROYER

United States Attorney
s/ Susan Prose


Susan Prose

Assistant United States Attorney
1801 California Street, Suite 1600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Tel.: (303) 454-0100; Fax: (303) 454-0404
Counsel for the Federal Bureau of Prisons
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (CM/ECF)
I hereby certify that on February 9, 2018, I served the foregoing document2 on the
following non-CM/ECF participant by United States mail addressed as follows:

Matthew Hale
Reg. No. 15177-424
ADX – Florence
P.O. Box 8500
Florence, CO 81226
s/ Susan Prose


Susan Prose

United States Attorney’s Office
2 A copy of the unpublished case cited in this response was previously provided to Mr. Hale.
 


                                                     THE CREATIVITY MOVEMENT
 

 

Thursday, 8 February 2018

Bashing the Rich...By Ben Klassen






 
Bashing the Rich
Fangs of Bolshevism
The basic plank of Karl Marx’s communist creed is that the rich are the incarnation of all the world’s evil, and must be exterminated from the face of the earth. Once these nasty rich, these "Capitalists" have been destroyed, the "proletariat," supposedly the working class, will take over, and there will be no more exploitation of the workers. Ipso facto, all problems, which are basically a matter of economics anyway (so the theory goes) will have been solved. If we will only get rid of those damn "Capitalists," we could have a beautiful new world order. Class distinctions will fade away, even government itself will dissolve into a sweet nothingness, and presto, and lo and behold! a new era for mankind! A veritable heaven on earth, a Worker’s Paradise will appear as if by magic. Just kill those damn Capitalists!

These bait-and-switch ideas encompassed in this con game are as Jewish as Henry Kissinger’s hooked nose and have a long Jewish history. In Protocol No. 1 of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, they say that by shouting the words "Liberty, Equality and Fraternity" they have brought into the Jewish ranks whole legions of the goyim, who carried their (Jewish) banners with enthusiasm, while their own Jewish agents did the advance work in surreptitiously spreading these ideas. These same words were canker worms at work, boring Into the well-being of the goyim society, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying the foundations of the goyim states.




Going back even further Into the murky channels of Jewish propaganda, we find that a mythical Christ was preempting Marx and expounding the same destructive ideas. It is all set forth in the New Testament, written by Jews for the destruction of the goyim. Those nasty damn rich! Oh, how we hate them! It will be easier for a camel to wander through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to ever get to heaven. Christians and Yids prefer such worthless derelicts of society as Lazarus, who was lazy, shiftless, penniless, and so sloven and sick that the dogs licked his open sores. Those are the kind of scum Christians like to see in heaven, but those damn rich will burn in hell forever and ever and ever, because oh! how the Lord hates them!

Marx’s brutal successors, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, ruthlessly pursued this evil communist dogma, and successfully conspired to engineer one of the most violent and destructive revolutions in history. Backed by the Jewish bankers of the world, especially the Federal Reserve bankers of the United States, they overthrew the three hundred year old Romanov dynasty of Russia, brutally murdered the Czar and his family (Nicholas H, his wife Alexandra and their five children), and the Bolsheviks’ Soviet of Workers Deputies took over Russia, the largest and richest (in natural resources) country in the world. Whereas, the front men in this revolution were Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky, the real string-pullers behind the scenes were the Jewish Kehilla, the Jewish bankers and the Jewish network as a whole, the latter having worked toward this goal for many centuries. Jacob Schiff, of the Jewish brokerage house of Kuhn, Loeb and Company in New York bankrolled Trotsky’s band of cutthroats to the tune of 20 million dollars during World War I and had them trained as killers and hatchetmen in Eastside New York for the takeover of the Russian Duma (parliament), and take over they did.
This Bolshevik revolution inaugurated the most evil and destructive era in the history of mankind. It is rivaled only by the destructive advent of Jewish Christianity that inaugurated the Dark Ages some fifteen hundred years earlier, and the similarity does not end there. (See "Christianity and Communism: Jewish Twins," page 363 of Nature’s Eternal Religion.)

Not only did Trotsky’s Jewish hatchetmen kill the members of the Duma, but in the bloody era of revolution, anarchy and famine that followed, the Jews had their Purim: they killed between 20
and 30 million White Russians as well. As in the French Revolution they killed off the leadership, Russia’s finest in keeping with the Jewish maxim: Kill the best of the goyim first. Among those killed were several of my Mennonite kinsmen. We ourselves lost our beautiful farm and household and everything we had, and fled the country in 1924.

So, in destroying the rich (actually only the White leaders) did the poor reap the millennium? Did they get a Worker’s Paradise? Hell, no! The Jewish dictatorship killed their goyim enemies, took over with a vengeance, and then clamped a brutal dictatorship on ‘the masses," a dictatorship they have maintained by sheer force and terrorism ever since. This they have done with the covert collaboration of the United States and its tremendous wealth and resources. (See "Russia, Israel and the United States," C.C. No. 38 of the White Man’s Bible.) With the United States ready to bail out the Bolshevik regime of Russia at every turn, the Jews have not only maintained their ironclad grip on the poor Russian victims, but have been able to expand their evil empire over most of the world. The result has been poverty, misery and heavy-handed tyranny over more than three-quarters of the population of the world. The unrest, chaos and destitution in Poland today is a current example, but only one of many.


So much for the communist revolution, much of which is already well known to most of our readers. What alarms us Creators is that a strange line of bolshevist propaganda is creeping in to the White racial movement today. Some of the "leaders" in some of the half-baked, ill-advised White movements are beginning to prominently spout the same sinister Bolshevik line. Instead of pointing the finger at the Jewish network (which certainly encompasses the superrich, the real money power) they are blaming and bashing the White "rich." Strangely, people like Gary Gallo, Tom Metzger and Wyatt Clay Kaldenberg are saying that the Jews aren’t really the bad guys. It is our own White people, our wealthy members, who are the real culprits. When I last visited Tom Metzger, he treated me to a replay of his Aryan Nations speech on his wide screen video player. Within two minutes of watching this speech, I told him frankly: "You sound like a communist." I also noted his repeated admiration of Lenin, of how his tactics "got things done." Yes, indeed he did with the backing and financing of a vast Jewish network, inside and outside Russia, which paved the way, supplied the financing, the blueprint and the manpower, every step of the way. More important and to the point, what about Lenin’s ideology? Tom had no comment on that, but I noticed that his library contained most of Lenin’s works.

When I confronted Gary Gallo face to face with this question: Do you or do you not believe the Jews are our prime enemies? He replied flatly, "No, the White rich are our main enemies."

Let us halt the program right here and examine this "rich versus the workers" issue once and for all. Let us ask a few cogent questions.

1. Are the rich any more crooked, dishonest, mean, morally depraved and otherwise villainous than, say, the poor or blue-collar class?

Answer: My observation after seventy years of dealing with every type of people imaginable, is, no they are not. Although White people are the finest and most honorable people in the world, you have good guys and bad guys in all classes, and there are just as many crooks, liars and petty thieves among the poor as there are among the rich, if not more so. In general, the rich are probably more responsible and trustworthy because they have more valuables to protect, including their reputation.

2. Are the rich mostly parasites on our society or do they contribute their share to the general welfare?

Answer: It is my opinion that the average man of means has contributed far more to society than the average poor. Let us take a few examples from history – Cyrus H. McCormick, who invented the first horse-drawn reaper, became wealthy because of his ingenious invention. As a result of this one invention, the then tens of thousands of farmers were able to produce three times as much grain and produce as they were able to do previously by using the hand operated sickle. Can you imagine what this means? One man’s invention was now equivalent to the work of all the farmers three times over. Certainly any rewards that McCormack reaped were a small pittance compared to the increased benefits he contributed to society in exchange.

The same can be said of Eli Whitney who invented the cotton gin and thereby laid the foundation to a huge and thriving cotton economy in the South. The same conclusions can be drawn for such illustrious inventors as James Watt, who invented the steam engine; Robert Fulton who built the first successful steam driven boat; Samuel F. B. Morse who invented the first telegraph; or Alexander Graham Bell who invented the first working telephone; or for that matter tens of thousands of others, who like Henry Ford did not invent anything new that was patentable, but built a successful business that put the nation on wheels, or like Bessemer who invented a new steel manufacturing process, thereby enabling engineers to build skyscrapers that were not possible previously.

At this point some rich basher will jump up and say, O.K., O.K., you have only been talking about inventors, and they are all right and fully deserve whatever their rewards, but most wealthy people were not Inventors.

All right, let’s look at some other entrepreneurs. Let’s look at the field of transportation. Some have formed companies that spanned the country with railroads from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Some built steamship lines. Some built stagecoach lines. Some built bus lines. Some, like Howard Hughes, Eddie Rickenbacker and dozens of others, built airlines. Certainly they created tens of thousands of jobs and contributed tremendously to the advancement of travel and transportation.

You want more? All right, let us look into the automotive business, which probably more than any other industry has created millions of jobs and tremendously expanded man’s ability to get around much faster and more comfortably than he could with a horse and wagon. We have already mentioned Henry Ford, but there were tens of thousands more such as Gottlieb Daimler and Karl Benz in Germany, or in America such enterprising pioneers as Charles Duryea, Ransom E. Olds, Elwood Haymes, Alexander Winton, Charles B. King, John D. Maxwell, Francis Edgar Stanley (the Stanley Steamer), Walter White and hundreds of others. In fact, there have been as many as 2000 automobile manufacturing companies, most of which are now either defunct or have merged with more successful competitors. Many of these lost their initial savings and went broke, some made a modest fortune and some like Ford made tremendous fortunes. But they produced and they contributed tremendously to the advance of technology and changed the face of America and the world.

Shall we continue and go farther afield? Why not? The field is unlimited. We can go into the food manufacturing industry and cite entrepreneurs like Post who started with cornflakes; or real estate developers like Del Webb who built whole cities, well planned and well built; or architects like Frank Lloyd Wright; or newspaper moguls like William Randolph Hearst; or movie makers like D. W. Griffith, and cartoonists, movie makers and theme park builders like Walt Disney. As I said, the field is unlimited, and I could go on endlessly.

All, or most of these men, made millions of dollars and huge fortunes. But I say that, by and large, they earned every penny and they deserved what they made because they contributed mightily to the advance of our economy, our technology, our welfare and our civilization as a whole.

But even though I could cite endless success stories that would fill volumes, rich-bashing malcontents like Tom Metzger and Gary Gallo would still not be satisfied, mostly because of envy that they themselves failed to make millions. What about all the idle rich who inherited their money? Well, even many of those are not necessarily drones, nor are they lazy and unproductive. We can cite geniuses like Howard Hughes, who inherited a tidy sum
of half a million dollars back in 1924 at the age of nineteen. But he did not sit on it and let it rust. He built up a motion picture industry, an airplane manufacturing industry, an airlines company, an electronics plant and had interests in a dozen other enterprises, catapulting his original inheritance of half a million into a multi-billion dollar fortune. Certainly the man produced jobs, he built companies and he produced a myriad of products. What more could a man do?

Besides Howard Hughes there are countless more who took a small inheritance and built huge empires. The one common denominator we will find among these men is that by and large they were highly energetic, they were men of imagination and on the average they were more intelligent than the average yokels. Certainly most of them were neither drones nor parasites, which, let’s face it, we cannot say about many drifters and freeloaders who are penniless and on welfare.

Over my seventy years of sojourn on this planet I have lived in four different countries and half a dozen different states of our good old U.S.A. My parents were poor and I, myself, grew up on a wheat farm in Saskatchewan. I have known all kinds of people – farmers, truck drivers, miners, ditch-diggers and millionaires, politicians, governors, senators, artists, writers, inventors, Nazis, Jews, niggers, scoundrels and con-men. On the issue of dividing the rich and the poor, I would have to come to the inevitable conclusion that men of means are, by and large, more intelligent, more interesting, more imaginative and easier people to deal with than are those who have never been able to put their act together and accumulate at least a comfortable nest egg to provide for themselves and their families. I say this without rancor and without prejudice. In summation, I would conclude that these people who have amounted to something financially are usually the movers and the doers and are, by and large, the pillars of our society that have advanced the White Race forward.
 
We now come to the last refuge of the rich-bashers who will strike their last nasty blow and accuse the rich of not having done enough to help promote the cause of us White racists in our fight against the foul Jewish conspiracy that is now threatening to destroy Natures’ Finest – the White Race. In this charge I can totally concur. The tens of thousands of wealthy White men and women In this country, many of whom are the owners of huge fortunes, have done damn little to aid our cause, a cause which most certainly should also be theirs. But again, in fairness to all the rich, to all the middle class and to the poor, none of these have greatly bestirred themselves to fight back against this monster that is now devouring us, and certainly the average blue-collar worker, who Is content watching the boob tube while guzzling his beer, is as criminally negligent as are those well-do-do individuals that Metzger and Gallo like to label as "fat-cats" and would just as soon see hung. Just as there are any number of exceptions among the blue-collar workers, so are there among the affluent. Certainly, Henry Ford, one of the wealthiest billionaires of our century, bestirred himself about the Jewish menace some sixty-five years ago and put out a series of exposes in his Dearborn Independent extirpating the Jewish network. Also, after years of research on "the Jewish problem" he put out a four-volume set of books on The International Jew.




Andrew Carnegie, born a Scotsman, but destined to become one of America’s foremost steel magnates, contributed 350 million of his fortune to charity. Of this, a huge sum went to building public libraries in every major city across America, so that boys would not be handicapped in obtaining books to read, a privilege that he himself was denied as a youth. He also instituted a number of other charitable institutions for the advancement of learning, and authored a number of outstanding books.

So much for the benefits bestowed upon society by the rich and affluent, the kind of people that Metzger and Gallo and many other envious people would like to hang. Having said all these nice things about wealthy Whites, let me make it clear that I like the blue-collar working man just as well, as long as he is White. I myself have done plenty of hard manual labor in my younger years. Being brought up on the farm, as a kid I milked cows, herded cows, picked rocks off the fields all day. By the time I was ten I was stocking sheaves in the

wheat fields, or hauling grain to the elevator. By the time I was 15 I manned a team and rack as a full-fledged member of a threshing crew, an arduous labor of 12 hours, in the field from 6 A.M. to 7 P.M., with one hour out for lunch. This I did for several years during harvest, even as I was working my way through college. During some of these summer sessions I also worked in the nickel mines of Sudbury, Ontario, down in a stope sometimes as far as 5000 feet underground. This was hot, humid and suffocating work, shoveling heavy nickel ore eight hours a day. So let me assure you, I am no stranger to manual labor.
The vital point in this whole discussion is: We need all of our White Racial Comrades to build a powerful affluent and well structured White society. We need the rich, the poor, the middle class, the entrepreneurs, the managers, the planners, the promoters, the builders, the businessmen, the storekeepers and the farmers; especially the farmers, and I might add there are some very wealthy farmers, or were, until recently.


The real culprits that are destroying our country, our White society, our environment, and the White Race in particular, is the Jewish cabal, that eternal parasite which has destroyed peoples and civilizations for thousands of years. It is Jewish money and Jewish power that has been and is subversive and destructive to the White Man’s society, and is enslaving the world. At the core of this bestial monster is the Federal Reserve Board and the network of Jewish bankers that own and control the parasitic monetary systems throughout the world. They not only control the monetary systems, but because of the tremendous power they thereby wield, and because of racial loyalty practiced by the Jewish race, they also control the governments, the newsmedia and every other nerve center of power. Backing up the Jewish bankers is the whole Jewish network, forming a sinister conspiracy to not only enslave the workers and producers of the world, but to mongrelize and destroy the White Race, the rich and the poor, the middle class in particular.

There is the real culprit – the whole Jewish network, as such, with the financiers manipulating the strings and planning the strategy.

It is at this point that we, the Church of the Creator, part company with Gary Gallo and Tom Metzger. Whatever their reasons for going off on this kind of destructive tangent, we will not sit idly by. To concentrate on bashing the White rich is not only highly confusing, but it is an outright deception. It is not even a racial issue, but overt class division among our White Racial Comrades, a communist plank and Bolshevik tactic of the first order. Nothing could be more destructive and confusing to the rank and file of the White racial movement, nor could anything be more comforting to our mortal enemy, the parasitic Jew, than blaming the White rich.

Gary Gallo has a strange and dubious background for one who contends that he is fighting for the White racial cause. I am told by one of his former close aids that his grandfather, whom Gary much admired, was a hot pink commie. How much of it transferred to the grandson we cannot tell, but evidently many of the grandfather’s communist ideas took root in the grandson, as Gary’s ostensible program, what little there is, seems to indicate. Gary’s National Democratic Front (NDF) advocates (a) the progressive income tax (b) confiscation of property (c) no inheritance to the children of a family (d) state owned production facilities (e) hang the rich!
 
All of the above are outright planks of Marx’s Communist Manifesto, as any student of the conspiracy will easily recognize. Whereas Gary readily latched on to the allure of the Communist Manifesto, with or without his grandfather’s tutelage, It took him three years (by his own admission) to accept that the Jewish holocaust was a gigantic hoax, even after the facts were plainly laid out before him.

But that isn’t all. Whether it is part of the Communist Manifesto or not, Gary has come up with another plank that is even more devastating, and that is – to slice up our American homeland and divvy it up among the different ethnic groups – niggers, Cubans, Mexicans, Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Haitians, Vietnamese, and of course, the Whites would be allotted a slice somewhere, too. We Creators say loud and clear – to hell with that
noise! Our pioneering forefathers fought and bled to conquer this land. They took it by force and conquest. I repeat – conquest – from the mud races and built a mighty White nation. For any White traitor now to come along and advocate that we are willing to give It to all the scum and mud races of the world, free and gratis, on a silver platter – that, my friend, is unspeakable lunacy and foul treason to the White Race. Whose side is this fellow on? Whatever, we want no part of the NDF.

We now come to Tom and John Metzger who are a different case, but also indulge in bashing the rich and the "fat-cats," and also agree on slicing up America and handing vast areas over to the mud races.

Tom is an aggressive promoter and is doing a yeoman job of getting publicity for the White racial cause, all of which is to his credit. However, publicity isn’t everything, unless it is espousing sound principles. Bruce Springsteen and Michael Jackson are each getting a thousand times more publicity than Tom and John put together, but neither is necessarily aiding the White racial cause.

What is even more deleterious is that Metzger also espouses a polyglot program of "working with" everybody. Well, almost everybody, except those he does not like. He will "work with" Christians and Identity racists, although he blandly professes he does not believe the stuff. He will embrace the Odinists, although he does not believe that claptrap either. He will gladly collaborate with such Trotskyites as Wyatt Clay Kaldenberg, who happens to be a racist, Incidentally, as well as a Trotskyite. This is perfectly acceptable and does not bother Tom at all. Tom even likes to play footsie with such niggers as Louis Farrakhan, since he, too, is a racist, even though a nigger racist who hates Jews and Whitey with equal venom. Tom has even made unsuccessful overtures to such international celebrities as Mummar Kaddafi, who also hates the Jews, as well as the United States and the White Race.

So what does Tom and WAR stand for? It is hard to tell, since his specific platform, if any, is transparently thin, shallow and skimpy at best, other than that he agrees with Gary about bashing the rich Whites and slicing up American territory In order to turn it over to 57 varieties of mud races. Somehow, Tom’s philosophy reminds me of a big city prostitute, who not having any firm principles of her own, finds it easy to crawl into bed with just about anybody. There are, however, a few exceptions. Whereas Tom deplores the strict and uncompromising code, creed and program of the Church of the Creator, he himself feels free to disagree and denounce anyone he chooses, but heaven forbid that we Creators should do likewise.

Well, we Creators damn well feel free to criticize the Jews, the communists, the niggers, or any member of the White Race, for that matter, if we feel that such people are leading the White Race down a dead end street to a major catastrophe. Why can’t these fellows learn the obvious lessons of history that are plainly staring them in the face?

All this is painfully reminiscent of the George Wallace experience of some twenty years ago. I remember back in 1962 seeing those dramatic TV pictures of George Wallace standing in the schoolhouse door defying U.S. Attorney Nicholas Katzenbach and his U.S. marshals in enforcing integration of our public schools. At that time I was still somewhat apolitical, and had not even joined the John Birch Society. But it excited my racial instincts. A few years later I became politically involved. I joined the George Wallace campaign and by 1968 I was the Florida Chairman of the American Independent Party, promoting George Wallace for president. But soon I began to see strange things happening in the Wallace camp. He had a number of Jews in his entourage. He began waffling with double talk. He began to brag about the fact that he was not "anti-Semitic," in fact, look at the Jews in his staff. He began to veer and veer and veer. Soon he was no longer a racist, and in the end he bragged he had more niggers in the Alabama state bureaucracy than any other governor before him.

I denounced him and left him in 1969, realizing that he had been set up from the beginning to be a chabez-goi stooge, designed to neutralize the racial instincts of millions of our best White militants.


We now return to Tom Metzger and Gary Gallo and their ill-advised philosophies.
The first obvious lesson we want to remind them of is that the Marxist planks are Jewish in origin and are highly destructive to a White people and society. Russia has been under the Marxist heel for 70 years. I was born in the Russian Ukraine. Before World War I the Ukraine was the most productive bread basket in the world and could feed all of Europe. Today, under the Marxist regime, not only is the whole Russian economic program in shambles, but land-rich Russia can’t even feed her own people, and has to beg and import millions of tons of wheat and foodstuffs from the United States and other countries. If the Russian economy had not been propped up on numerous critical occasions over the last 70 years by the Jew-loving United States, it would have collapsed long ago. (See "Russia, Israel and the United States" in the White Man’s Bible.)

The same thing is happening in Communist Poland. The economy is on the verge of collapse. The people are destitute and starving. They are in a perpetual state of rebellion. With the slightest real encouragement from the United States, the Polish people would overthrow and demolish that tyrannical Jewish regime, once and for all. The same thing can be said of Hungary, Rumania and all of eastern Europe now under the Marxist heel. Anyone with even half a brain can readily perceive that the Marxist doctrine destroys private initiative and private enterprise. The result is stagnation, poverty, misery and total breakdown. You can only bash "the rich" once, you can only rob them once, but after the initiative is gone, productivity too, is gone, and there is no one else left to strip and rob. Look fellows, damn it, it just doesn’t work. Marxism is just a Jewish swindle, plain and simple. It doesn’t work.

The second lesson Gary, Tom and Co. should learn is that you can’t overthrow the Jewish powerhouse with a polyglot assortment of divided little "movements," if such they can be called, even though you might have 10,000 of them, or 20,000 of them, as we have witnessed over the last fifty years. What we are witnessing in the so-called White racial movement today is what we call the P.C.I.C., namely a Polyglot Conglomerate of Irreconcilable Contradictions. This leaves us wide open to the Jewish powerhouse for their "Divide and Conquer" technique, because, like the big city whore we mentioned, we can’t seem to polarize around any firm principles of our own. Like Harold Covington says in his book, The March Up Country, most White racial movements not only have no idea as to how to get there, they don’t even know where they want to go. That pretty well sums up the whole mess of the Polyglot Conglomerate of Irreconcilable Contradictions, if you don’t know where you are going, you sure as hell won’t know how to get there. The fact is, we are no closer to destroying the real enemy today than we were 30, or 40, or 50 years ago. And the real enemy, let me point out again, is not the rich White, but the goddamn sinister worldwide Jewish network. There is not a rich White, nor a White politician, for that matter, in the United States today that wields any real power, and this includes even such highly visible families as the Rockefellers or the Kennedys.


 
 
We Creators do have a real, meaningful creed, program and doctrine. It is embodied in a comprehensive doctrine that takes in politics, economics, race, eugenics, religion, the environment, Salubrious Living and just about every other facet of human endeavor that is vital to the survival, expansion and advancement of the White Race on a worldwide scale. Why do people like Tom, Gary and others in the movement choose to Ignore It and espouse the sordid Marxist principles of bashing the rich (Whites, that is), promoting the progressive income tax, confiscation of private property and other Jewish claptrap? Not only do these fellows choose to ignore Creativity which has real answers for the White Race but they are openly hostile to it and vociferously attack it.

Why do they choose such an insane course when history has proven that not until the Germans united around one polarized creed (under Hitler) did they finally have the clout to destroy the Jewish monster?
 
I’ll tell you why. The answer is hubris, hubris. They are jealous. Creativity shows up the poverty of their own half-baked, ill-conceived "programs," if such they can be called. As stated in Racial Loyalty No. 32, "Hubris, Hubris," if they don’t have it, if they didn’t think of it first, they would rather torpedo Creativity than embrace it, even if the White Race goes down along with the torpedoed ship.
 Hubris, Hubris... By Ben Klassen


So be it. To hell with them. With friends like that, who needs enemies? If they value their own little hubris more than the White Race and want to wet nurse it rather than save the White Race, so be it. Sooner or later they will die or go out of business and their precious little hubris will die along with them. But Creativity will go on regardless. We will ignore their petty jealousies, their goddamn P.C.I.C. and instead keep attracting more and more members and build and build until we have one mighty tidal wave that will overwhelm and crush the foul Jewish network. We sure as hell don’t need cooperation from useless ballast that wants to slice up our precious territory and give it to the mud races, nor do we need the intrusion of Marxist doctrine to confuse and louse up our creed and program. There is one thing that is a lot worse than a capitalist, and that is a capitulator. To hell with the defeatists and the traitors. We don’t need them. We would rather have them as enemies outside our ranks than inside the fort and burrowing from within. Who needs capitulators? We Creators will never agree to give up one inch of our territory – territory won by the blood of our pioneering forefathers. We regard that as treason. Who needs defeatists? Instead, join with the C.O.T.C.; support the C.O.T.C. and build a movement with strength and purpose. Our unswerving and uncompromising goal is the Planet Earth – all of it – and we will never rest until all of it is settled by a regenerated and rejuvenated White Race – Nature’s Finest.

Ben Klassen
Founder Church of the Creator

 
 

 


 

 


 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
ARTICLE TAKEN FROM RACIAL LOYALTY # 45
DECEMBER 15AC (1988)
 
 
 
Destroying the White rich has never benefitted the poor, but invariably transfers their properties into fewer and fewer hands of the super-rich Jewish bankers and money-manipulators.
* * * *
How many times do some people have to be hit over the head with a telephone pole before they learn the obvious lesson of history – that Marxist programs were designed by Jews for the destruction of the White Race?
* * * * *
Our forefathers fought, bled and died to conquer this precious territory now known as America. For any White Man to now suggest that we voluntarily turn it over to the mud races on a silver platter is unmitigated racial treason at its worst.

THE CREATIVITY MOVEMENT